I believe this is originally from Buzzfeed, discovered via Alice Taylor’s Wonderland blog. Presented without comment, but heaps of admiration. Comments below…
Jessica just mentioned that she’d shown this to a coworker, who in turn showed it to her hyper-Christian friends, who were shocked by the “nudity”. My impression was that they were more disturbed by the relative anatomical correctness of the Barbie fat suit. Granted, all this one has that the stock Barbie is missing are nipples, but whatever.
Then I started thinking about anatomically correct dolls and how they’re used. I’m imagining a sort of “Law and Order: Special Victims Unit, Toy Story Edition” scenario…
Cop (indicating the fat-suited Barbie): “Go ahead, show us where Twinkie the Kid touched you.”
Victim (sobbing): “I can’t! I have type two diabetes! He said that if I ever told anyone he’d come back and give me type three diabetes!”
Cop: “He can’t ever do that. You’re safe with us. Not to mention there’s no such thing as type three diabetes.”
Alright, I realize that some researchers are trying to categorize certain Alzheimer’s characteristics as “type three” diabetes, but this is all just a bunch of bad jokes about a fat doll, after all.















